magpie logo

The Rise of the Machines: AI ‘story engines’

If you’re book-Twitter-adjacent you will doubtless have heard there’s an AI book generator out there created by a company called Sudowrite. (As in “Pseudowrite”, which is at least honest. I’m also thinking Sudocrem, which is stuff you put on a baby’s bottom when it’s got sore from sitting in its own excrement. Anyway.)

This purports to generate you a book. According to the promo video, you do a “brain dump” of a vague idea, and throw in a couple of characters if you can be bothered. That gets ‘expanded’ into a synopsis, which gets ‘expanded’ into a chapter by chapter breakdown, which gets ‘expanded’ into text, and lo and behold the AI has written you a book!

Let’s just remind ourself: artificial intelligence is not intelligent. It’s a prediction engine. It has scraped billions of words of text and it offers you what it judges to be the most likely one to come up next. If you spend your keyboard time thinking, “What’s the most predictable word or plot event I can use here, I really need this to be something the reader will totally expect”, this could be the tool for you.

So you feed the predictive text engine an idea (in the sample video it’s an idea which bears a strong resemblance to The Impossible Us by Sarah Lotz, published 2022) and it suggests helpful things like, er, all the minor characters. In the video it generates a Wise Mentor, a Jealous Rival, a Supportive Friend, and a Villain. Amazing, what human could have thought of that. Then it “puts a lot of chains of language models together to figure out what are some compelling beats that would hit the plot points”, which is to say, it looks for the most predictable route the story could possible take.

Then it generates text. Jesus wept. I’ll just quote from my anguished Twitter howl:

The opening of the novel reads “It was a sterile space devoid of personal touches” and I shouted “Ha!” so loud the cat jumped. I mean, if I wrote that in a book about the soul-killing effects of AI generated literature, I’d think, “wow that symbolism is a bit too heavy handed.”

lol* the AI text introduces the man with a summary of his professional achievements and the woman with a description of her “simple form-fitting dress that accentuated her curves” and shimmery hair.

*by ‘lol’ I mean ‘vomit’.

Of course you don’t have to use the completely generated AI text! I mean, you will if you’re a Kindle Unlimited page farmer; KU is about to be rammed with this crap, probably unread by the people generating it, who will be cranking it out as fast as the cliché engine can run.

The website offers a sample of its romance writing:

Lady Catherine’s heart raced as she leaned in to meet the lips of the dashing Marquess of Eastwick. Their lips touched and the air between them seemed to ignite. She felt his strong arms wrap around her, pulling her closer as their kiss deepened. The thrill rushed through her veins and the worries of the world seemed to fade away as they clung to each other, their passionate embrace fueled by months of unspoken longing.

But as they reluctantly pulled away, Lady Catherine’s expression grew serious once more. Though her love for the Marquess was undeniable, she knew that she could not simply surrender her heart without knowing the depths of his conviction. She would not become a gambler’s widow.

“My lord,” she spoke, her voice filled with both tenderness and firmness. “My heart beats for you, but I cannot give it so easily. You must prove your love for me is true and everlasting.”

The Marquess of Eastwick’s heart sank at the thought of losing his love, but he knew that he must remain composed in this moment. “Tell me what I must do to earn your trust,” he implored, his voice filled with sincerity.

Lady Catherine met his gaze with a steady gaze of her own. “You must show your devotion to me until the end of the Season,” she replied. “You must avoid all wagers, cease all gambling, and abstain from any behavior that would cause a scandal. If you can prove your love for me in this way, and if your heart remains true, then perhaps we may consider a future together.”

I think what I find most depressing about this is that it’s just—just—plausible enough that page farmers will hoover it up. They won’t care about the repetition, the grammar errors, the POV switch, the grinding predictability, the way it feels like a very wordy synopsis, the soullessness. It looks sufficiently like writing that you can get away with it, but what’s there to enjoy?

Still, you don’t need to use the generated text! If you see yourself as a ‘real’ author rather than a page farmer, you can ‘collaborate’ with it, and just use it to ‘help’. Here are some of the things its website offers:

When the words just won’t come out – Write can do it for you

Write is like autocomplete on steroids. It analyzes your characters, tone, and plot arc and generates the next 300 words in your voice. It even gives you options!

If you don’t know what to write next, you need to work out why not. Maybe your characters are insufficiently developed, maybe you’re facing a plot hole, may be you haven’t developed your story enough, maybe you’re going down a wrong path. You need to stop and think hard about where you are and where you’re going. This process is literally how you make your book, because writing a book is not in fact a matter of typing till you have 70,000 words.

Pacing too fast? Presto expand-o

No matter how much time you spend planning, you’ll end up with some sections that feel rushed. Expand magically builds out your scenes so the pacing doesn’t take readers out of the story.

If a section feels rushed, that probably requires really close textual work. Why did you rush it—because of driving plot urgency, or because you were skating across a tricky part, or because you were having too much fun to slow down? You need to work this out, because all of those will need to be treated differently, and then you’ll have to think very hard about how to add whatever’s needed without clogging the scene or unbalancing the structure around it. Or you can just get a machine to plonk in some extra words. Whichever.


The process of writing a book is generally one long string of hitting problems. That’s not a bug, it’s a feature. You write a book by solving the problems, one after another (what does this character want? where is this conversation going? what am I trying to say?). That’s literally the process. I have again and again discovered what I’m trying to do in a book precisely because I was trying to solve a problem.

I needed to tie up loose ends > I reshaped the entire plot and ending

I got hopelessly stuck > I realised I was telling the wrong story

If you ‘want to write a book’ but you don’t want to create your own characters, and come up with your own world, and weave your own plot, and make it heartfelt or moving or exciting or bewildering, and to spin your own sentences, and to take on this challenge you’ve chosen to the best of your ability…okay, but what part of ‘writing a book’ is it that you want to do? Where’s the satisfaction in looking at the elements of writing a book, and pressing a button that does them for you?

I press a button to make a machine wash my dishes because I want clean dishes and I’m not interested in the process. If you think the process of writing a book is a lot of annoying busy-work that’s obstructing you from your goal of being an Author, then I suppose you would indeed be delighted to automate it, but I can’t help feeling you might have missed the entire point of writing. (Unless you’re a KU page farmer, in which case it makes perfect sense.)

And don’t tell me that you’ll come up with the brilliant parts in the time you’ve saved letting Chat GPT generate your secondary characters and your plot; that you’ll take your predictive text pig’s ear and turn it into a silk purse. You know as well as I do that’s not how it works. If you want to raise wonderful flowers, you need to dig the damn ground.

I’m not being all Protestant work ethic here. I don’t see any moral good in crying over a MS. I’m just saying, art is created by putting in learning, practice, experience, hard graft, personal commitment. You put those in, you get art out. You put in a slurry of recycled text geared for the most predictable outcome…well, you get what you give.

A predictive text machine isn’t going to help you understand the deep reason you can’t get that bloody scene done. It’s not going to suggest that piece of imagery that brings your whole book into focus, or the twist that will make readers tweet incoherently gleeful outrage, or the magical line that makes them cry like it hurts, or the idea that makes them stare silently into the middle distance for a while. It’s not going to dig in to your pains and fears and rejections and dreams, and use them to pluck notes that resonate in other human beings’ souls. It’s not going to identify what’s going on when you can’t write at all. It’s not going to make you a better writer.

You are the one who needs to do those things, because that is what writing is. That’s what makes it writing, rather than typing; that’s what creates something memorable and moving and real. If you outsource the hard work to a text generator, you will indeed get a bunch of words in order. But you won’t have written a book. And you will have cheapened yourself and your work in the process.


Some practical notes:

  1. The Sudowrite AI has been trained on fanfiction (hilariously revealed because it ‘knows’ very specific sex tropes from omegaverse fanfic). The people who wrote the billions of words on AO3 weren’t asked permission to have their words used as a training dataset. Their own creative, lovingly composed, often deeply personal work has been scraped and used without consent or payment to create profit-generating software. That is morally wrong if not legally questionable. Moreover, fanfiction is derivative work and thus not for profit. You can play with my worlds with my goodwill but they’re not yours to sell. So if this AI has been trained on fanfic, it’s been trained on derivative works based on original copyrighted work. I confidently expect this whole mess to bite someone on the arse.
  2. Because AI text is produced by a plagiarism machine, it cannot be copyrighted. (I copied that large chunk of “romance” above without asking for permission, and I could have copied the entire ‘novel’.) Obviously you can still stick an AI McBook on KU and say it’s yours, I can’t stop you. But all traditional publishing contracts have a clause along the lines of this (taken from the Author’s Guild model contract):

Author represents and warrants that:

–Author owns and has the right to convey all of the rights conveyed herein to Publisher and has the unencumbered right to enter into this Agreement; Author is the sole owner of the copyright in the Work (or of Author’s contribution to the Work, as the case may be);

–the Work or Author’s contribution to the Work is original and has not previously been Published in any form

If you’ve used AI to generate your book you cannot warrant this to a publisher, and if you sign a contract knowing that your warranty is untrue, you may be in for a world of pain which you will entirely deserve.

_____________________________________

If you are stuck on a book, you can ask a human expert rather than a cliche generator to help you work out why!

22 replies
  1. Liz Thompson
    Liz Thompson says:

    Detailed, and accurate. Mind you, I’ve encountered some properly-authored stuff that sounds much the same. Though not from you, of course.

    Reply
  2. Sarah
    Sarah says:

    Thanks for this. I have been quietly freaking out and its nice to have an intelligent report on the topic. I also love your sarcasm and wit. And your books.

    Reply
  3. Debbie Baker
    Debbie Baker says:

    Thank you for the insight into Pseudowrite (lol), and THANK YOU for the lovely caring words about fanfic authors; it’s certainly more than we’ve gotten from the OTW at this point. <3

    (Sidenote: I am halfway through Secret Lives of Country Gentlemen and LOVING IT.)

    Reply
  4. Theo Fenraven
    Theo Fenraven says:

    I read the article about Sudowrite yesterday, and I admit I was immediately depressed. It takes me a long time to write a novel, and I’ve never enjoyed the success of authors like you (I suck at self-promo), but I love writing and do it anyway. I wondered why I bother, yet this morning, first thing, I sat at the computer and wrote, in the full realization that I might never finish it and no one may ever read it. It took me many years to learn to write well. I take great joy in a finely tuned sentence. I likely won’t stop writing until I die. I will never use AI to produce content. If I can’t do it myself, what’s the bloody point?

    Reply
    • KJ Charles
      KJ Charles says:

      I feel you. I can at least understand the people who just think “wow I can make a few quid with this book generator”, you know, basic hustlers, but the people who think this thing will make them authors, or better authors…like, no, you have failed to grasp something important. Bah.

      Reply
  5. HAL
    HAL says:

    “Let’s just remind ourself: artificial intelligence is not intelligent. It’s a prediction engine. It has scraped billions of words of text and it offers you what it judges to be the most likely one to come up next.”

    I always find critiques like this amusing. I guess most never take seriously the idea that our brains are nothing more than prediction engines as well basically, just an organic mode. In that sense to constantly claim AI is not intelligent is perhaps to also say that we are not intelligent. 😐

    So many of the critiques of the AI writing here could easily be applied to amateur human writers, who fill so much of publishing space now with similar material. It’s almost as if the AI does a very good job of mimicking our intelligence.

    And this is just the baby opening its eyes. It will be interesting to see where all these superior human intellects are and what they’re saying 10-20 years from now as the AI exponentially develops. I have a feeling articles like this will become historically very interesting – to human or AI minds, I’m not sure.

    Reply
  6. layla
    layla says:

    I wish people had the same energy for working class people who’s jobs are being eliminated by technology. where’s the outrage for folks like cashiers? once again, the only voices being amplified are those of peope with privilege.

    Reply
  7. Kris
    Kris says:

    I recently read this blog post with examples of AI writing scenes from different kinds of novels.

    https://www.nownovel.com/blog/dialogue-writing-examples/

    The AI versions are noticeably full of bland telling with too much clichéd physical description. At the same time I was rereading the Will Darling series, and I noted how you sometimes have two or three pages of dialogue with only a few brief gestures – and it works because we know the characters so well, we can picture them in the scene and understand their thoughts through their words.

    We don’t need all the “mixture of surprise and admiration flickering in her eyes” etc., not to mention the consistently soft-spoken, timid female characters.

    On the other hand, I know a few people in education who are interested in the way AI programs could be able to help students who have ADHD or dyslexia, or who aren’t native English speakers. But that’s another issue.

    Reply
  8. dodo
    dodo says:

    I`m worried about AI, about all the aspects of life it will have an impact on.
    However, what do you mean by “Kindle Unlimited page farmer”? Please bear with me as English is not my mother tongue.
    I, too, have a subscription for KU and I’m aware how huge the influx to KU has become and how very varied the quality is (often very low). However, for me as a reader with limited means it has been a glorious way to follow some of my favorite authors who put out KU-titles as well as titles to be purchased “normally” (which I buy because I got hooked for good). I also buy “real” books – sometimes online but also in “real” bookshops, like your books.
    Sometimes I buy those titles I fell in love with on KU / as e-books as those titles I love dearly I also want to hold in real life (the e-book-format is just not the same). Being an avid reader and not wanting to stop my KU subscription right now – does this make me a KU page farmer? Which is clearly meant as something bad / an insult?

    Reply
    • Bel
      Bel says:

      I’m sure KJ will reply with a better explanation, but NO, you are not a KU page farmer.
      I assume she means people who create large amounts of poor quality content in a short amount of time, to make money selling on (or is it ‘to’? I’m not sure how it works) Kindle Unlimited. Not someone who reads using Kindle Unlimited. Read all you want!

      Reply
    • KJ Charles
      KJ Charles says:

      A page farmer is a person who tries to cheat the KU system by uploading rubbishy books, or ones with 1000 pages that fake you having read the whole thing, in order to get money. Book-uploaders, not actual authors, and definitely not readers. There’s nothing wrong with reading on KU, though I suspect you’re about to find it becoming all but worthless to you because it will be rammed with AI crap.

      Reply
  9. Charlotte
    Charlotte says:

    Unsurprisingly, this was beautifully articulated. I have just finished one of your books and there was a particular line that no AI could write, which had me laughing loudly and repeatedly as I read, and re-read it. To quote: “Robin say and listened to music for several hours, and was disappointed to learn that only forty minutes had passed on the clock.” It was hilarious, relatable, and just the type of nonsensical – yet utterly apt – humour that I suspect AI will never fully grasp. It’s also what is so fun about reading; the feeling of a moment’s connection to a stranger over a line that many others may not even notice, or if they do, then the connection only grows.

    I read books for the human connection, as do most of us I think. Whether AI is ever able to create a half decent book is beside the point.

    Also, on a side note; I have tried writing a couple of “books” and unlike many romance writers I found the sex scenes incredibly easy to write, but really struggled with the necessary drama/conflict. I love your books for the fact that the conflict is always real and never the sort that could be solved by a single conversation they don’t bother to have. Thus, the HEA feels like it might actually last.

    As to which part of writing a book I actually want to do? Turns out it’s the sex part. I think I see a compilation of short stories in my future. Hah!

    Reply
  10. Someone Somewhere
    Someone Somewhere says:

    I happen to be one of those fanfic authors whose stories were scraped. I wasn’t even aware such a thing had occured until I was reading a (rather popular) book and kept finding unique aspects of my characters and writing within – so much that it seemed freakishly coincidental. Either this person was my literary doppelganger or ?? I then came across another author who claimed this same book’s plot was taken directly from her self-published story. The kicker? We have the same first name and grew up in the same geographic location. Did Ai’s algorithm mix our writing together to produce said book through a program such as Sudowrite? I have no way of knowing or proving it, but it seems plausible.

    Reply

Leave a Reply

Want to join the discussion?
Feel free to contribute!

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published.

This site uses Akismet to reduce spam. Learn how your comment data is processed.